Should I Have Kids?
Should I have a child — and who exactly is it for?
The question
You're thirty-four and the question won't leave you alone. Not the soft version — do I want this — the hard one, the one that wakes you up. Because you've done the maths, and the maths is brutal: the money you don't have, the planet you've watched get worse every single year of your adult life, the headlines telling you your country needs you to do this, as if your womb were a line item in someone's budget. And underneath all of it, a thought you can't quite say to anyone: that you would be reaching into the dark and pulling out a person — a whole person, with a whole life, who never asked to be here, who can't be asked, because there's no one there to ask yet. You keep trying to decide what's best for the kid. And some quiet part of you has started to suspect that the sentence "what's best for the kid" doesn't mean what you think it means — that when you go looking for the child whose interests are supposed to settle this, there's nobody home.
The episodes
Each episode builds on the one before, and the finale hands the question back to you sharper, not settled.
9 of 9 transcripts are readable now — audio is coming.
-
1
Whose decision is this?
A couple sits down with a spreadsheet to decide whether to have a child, and the exercise comes to feel obscene before the arithmetic is done. The first episode clears the table — setting aside the culture's ready answers — and finds the flaw in the sensible method — there is no one yet on the child's side of the decision to be deciding for.
Read transcript → -
2
You can't picture your way to this
L. A. Paul's argument about transformative experience — you cannot picture your way into this choice, because having a child remakes the chooser's values, so there is no settled you to do the weighing. Asking the people who know does not help either; what they know does not fit into words.
Read transcript → -
3
You can't ask the one who matters most
Everywhere else, imposing something serious and unchosen on a person requires consent or a strict justification, and Seana Shiffrin presses that standard on procreation itself, with Rivka Weinberg building on the same ground. The one reply left standing — for the child's own good — is earned seriously, and handed to the next episode to test.
Read transcript → -
4
There is no one there to ask
Derek Parfit's Reasons and Persons (1984) and the non-identity problem — wait a few months and you do not get a better-off version of the same child, you get a different child, so "better or worse for the kid" has nothing to attach to. David Boonin then tries to hand back one piece of the broken gauge.
Read transcript → -
5
Always a harm — even in paradise
With the obvious gauge broken, the easy no is close at hand — and the episode refuses to let it in as a relief. David Benatar's Better Never to Have Been, arguing that coming into existence is always a harm even in a paradise, is given its full grip as the serious case a no would actually need.
Read transcript → -
6
If you do it, owe it everything
Julian Savulescu's principle of procreative beneficence — grant that no duty is owed to a particular child, and a reason still survives at the impersonal level, to bring about the better-off life among those one could create. The reason that survives is not the warm one that was wanted, and what it implies about the lives not chosen stays in view.
Read transcript → -
7
Breed for the nation? Or for no one but the two of you?
The politician's demand — baby bonuses, natalist panic — meets its refusal, and Christine Overall then reverses the burden of proof, asking why having children is treated as the default that needs no reason. Behind the cheap demand stands a serious one — an inherited world whose continuation might be owed something — and neither claim closes.
Read transcript → -
8
The gift you couldn't refuse
The oldest word said over a cot — gift — is examined rather than dismissed. Hannah Arendt's account of natality, the capacity for beginning on which freedom depends, gives the word its full weight; set against Benatar's harm, the gift neither fails nor wins, and the two descriptions attach to one and the same act.
Read transcript → -
9
On whose behalf?
The final episode asks where the idea came from that this is a private decision to be justified at a kitchen table — the spreadsheet itself has a history. No verdict is offered; the question is handed back in its honest form — on whose behalf, and on what ground, do you decide?
Read transcript →
Thinkers
The thinkers and traditions this series draws on: