Hope, Despair & the Future
My kid asked if it'll be okay, and I couldn't answer.
The question
I have a number I check. You probably have one too — a chart, a tracker, a feed of the bad news you've decided is the real news. Mine's the one with the line going up. And every morning I check it the way you'd press on a bruise, and the line is a little higher, and I tell myself I'm just staying informed. Facing reality. Not one of the people with their heads in the sand. Then someone at work says something hopeful — the technology's coming, people are mobilising, it's not too late — and I feel a flare of contempt I'm not proud of, because it sounds like a child who hasn't looked at the line.
But here's what I caught myself doing last week. My kid asked me — just asked — is it going to be okay? And I opened my mouth to give the honest answer, the clear-eyed one, the one that proves I've looked at the line. And I couldn't. Not because I'm soft. Because I suddenly wasn't sure the despair was the honest answer. I'd been treating "it's basically over" like a fact I'd bravely accepted — but standing there, I couldn't tell if I'd accepted it because the evidence forced me to, or because it let me off the hook. Because if it's over, I don't have to do anything. If it's over, my contempt for the hopeful is justified instead of cheap. And I realised I didn't actually know whether my despair was the truth or the place I go to hide.
The episodes
Each episode builds on the one before, and the finale hands the question back to you sharper, not settled.
9 of 9 transcripts are readable now — audio is coming.
-
1
The Number I Check
A number checked every morning, and a child's question — is it going to be okay — for which the honest answer refuses to come. The first episode sets out the question underneath the forecasts. What kind of thing is a hope, or a despair — a reading of the facts, or a stance you take and answer for?
Read transcript → -
2
Cope, or Courage?
The case for despair and the case for hope, each stated at its real height — the despairing case made tougher than the feeds make it, the hopeful case made tougher than the candle-and-quotation version. No winner is picked; when both cases stand at full strength they come out level, and the levelness itself is the finding.
Read transcript → -
3
Same Numbers, Different Hearts
Adrienne Martin's How We Hope (2013) is set against the cognitivist account on the question of what a hope actually is — a belief about what is possible, or a way of treating a possibility as a reason to act. The dispute is left unsettled, and what the two sides agree on turns out to be enough — two people can share every number on the chart and still end up in different places.
Read transcript → -
4
There's No 'More Accurate' Stance
The reasonable fallback — feel exactly what the evidence warrants, no more and no less — is examined and found empty. If two honest people read the same figures and land in opposite moods, there is no more accurate feeling to retreat to, and waiting for the picture to become clear enough to tell you how to feel is waiting for something the figures cannot contain.
Read transcript → -
5
Or You Could Give Up Hope Entirely
A position missing from the hope-or-doom argument. Seneca and Spinoza hold that hope and fear are one condition — a mind in suspense, hanging on a future it does not control — and that both can be deliberately set down; Ernst Bloch's educated hope treats hope as a collective practice rather than a private mood. Both are built seriously and left standing.
Read transcript → -
6
Despair Has an Old Name
Settled despair has an old name. Aquinas called it desperatio and traced it to acedia — the sorrow that flees the good and then calls the fleeing honesty — a vice, not an achievement of clear sight. The episode presses the accusation, hears the doomer's reply that a stance can have a disreputable history and still track the truth, and withdraws only despair's exemption from questioning.
Read transcript → -
7
And Hope Can Be the Lie
The same examination turned the other way — hope can be the comfortable option too, a reassurance that arrives before any looking has been done and whose function is to make sure the looking never happens. By the end neither the clear-eyed no nor the warm yes can claim to be simply seeing clearly.
Read transcript → -
8
Striving Without Certainties
Mara van der Lugt's hopeful pessimism — concede every grim figure, expect nothing from what you do, and act anyway. The position is built at full strength, tested on the most pointless thing the host does — visiting a relative who no longer knows him — and one doubt is left unresolved, whether the knowledge of having done right is itself a reward kept back.
Read transcript → -
9
Neither Hope Nor Resignation
Albert Camus, deliberately kept out until the last episode, argues that hope and despair are both appeals against the absurd — the collision between a mind that demands meaning and a world that does not answer. His test is put to every position in the series, including his own, and no verdict is offered.
Read transcript →
Thinkers
The thinkers and traditions this series draws on: